Today's guest blogger is a builder from New Jersey, Bill Asdal from American Micro-Homes, LLC. Bill is a past president (1995) of The Community Builders & Remodelers Association, Whippany, NJ, and was a past officer of The New Jersey Builders Association (2000-01). Bill is a life director of NAHB and chaired NAHB's Remodelers Council in 1996. He also chaired the NCHI (Leading Suppliers Council) in 2002.
Bill's national awards are as follows:
2006 NAHB Green Advocate of the Year
2007 NAHB Remodeling Hall of Fame
2012 NAHB Instructor of the Year
I have known Bill for many years; he is as dedicated to our industry as they come.
“A Public Thank You, from a
Builder to an Associate”
by Bill Asdal
![]() |
Bill Asdal
American Micro-Homes, llc
|
Last week my wife and I
were at a Zoning Board hearing in Califon, NJ for an interpretation of whether there
existed two lots or one lot associated with a property we had under contract
for purchase. The listing, and hope, was there were two lots so we could
restore the existing home and build a micro-home on the second half acre lot.
These small homes may just be the next generation of housing to fill America’s
dreams while consuming nearly no energy and a tiny footprint. Our prototype in
NY cost just $19.00 to heat in January!
We look and work for
solutions that can make better lives. The board seemed open minded but the
municipal planner, engineer, and attorney all have clearly been steeped in the
past decades of “application negativism” and had honed skills of finding the
worst scenario while casting off responsibility to “law”, “DEP”, “precedent”.
To say the least, two of the professionals were arrogant.
Multiple times the board
attorney cited the demeaning “these board members would simply not understand
this issue”. Really? The planner continually and pompously professed legal
opinions well beyond her qualifications.
Without replaying
the case, let it stand that the seller (estate) bought two lots in 1950 and 1955,
built a home and raised a family there for the rest of their lives. The extra
lot had a municipal lot and block assigned, a deed, a tax assessment, and the
borough collected taxes every year. We made our case. The feeling in the room
was dark with the professionals attacking the existence of the second lot with
statute and verse, case and law saying it had been merged with the main lot by
a “doctrine of merger” unbeknownst to the owners for 53 years and somehow
escaping the tax collectors grasp that it was gone to regulatory confiscation.
As the final vote was
nearing, the public was granted time to speak on the question at hand. The
attorney for the estate made his points that the family held the lot for financial
emergencies, that it was not maintained as lawn or used for the main home. Then
a gent from the back row arose and asked
to be recognized. He is 70 years old and told the board he has been in the real
estate business for over 37 years. He said he has watched laws take property
from owners. He said citizens write off as impossible the hurdles to change the
ways of the federal government. He said most surrender to the regulations of
the DEP and the Highlands and are vanquished by the often illogical regulations.
He said but HERE we have local citizens volunteering for local service who have
a chance to protect a local residents family. The parents are gone. The heirs
are at risk. He said before my very eyes tonight I am watching a “takings” of
land occur. He asked the board members to think hard about their vote. He asked
if there could be notice to all others in similar situations to protect their
land and family holdings. He asked them to take a first step in defending
rights at the local level for a local family. He asked they not be silently
compliant in the collapse of remaining property rights. It was clear he moved
some board members. On his conclusion the man sat back down.
The board attorney
dismissed the emotion in the air and remanded the board to vote NO to the
existence of the second lot. He told them they had no choice according to the
law.
The vote recognizing the
two lots went down by a vote of 2-6. The family lost their savings. I can find
no answer to who benefits to this denial.
I am moved to
chronicle these 90 minutes of hearing to recognize the man who pulled at the
heart strings of the board. He didn’t need to stand. He didn’t need to be
heard. He may have taken the last step in defense of any property rights of the
land owner. I think hopefully that he may have taken the first step in a broad
citizen rejection of our surrender of rights to government.
Sig Schorr was this last
man contributing to the public discussion. Sig is a good man. He is the real
deal. He is a contributor to a better society. I hope his steps to the front of
the room and plea for sanity of our citizens will be a small candle to
illuminate the way for others to step forward. Those with seats at the table
should be guided by such strength. We need to cultivate more citizens like Sig
Schoor. Thanks Sig for the wisdom, effort and reluctance to retreat from the
country we were raised in. It was inspirational.
Submitted by:

3 comments:
unbelievable that this is happening... and thank you for an eye opening story!
I am going to share this with some very influential people in my state...wow!
It is unfortunate the situation you have described is reality in more communities then most would imagine. As a frequent participant in property rights issues I am afraid the issue of "takings" is often witnessed "because they can." I admire this individual, and would encourage our members to support each other when we personally can make a difference. If we are to succeed in developing quality housing and communities in our nation -- there must be many Sigs in the audience. Excellent example!
Post a Comment